The patenting of computer-implemented inventions at the European Patent Office (EPO) is associated with a number of specific requirements based on the European Patent Convention (EPC) and established case law. A key feature is the necessity to prove the technical character of the computer-implemented invention; without it, the invention will be considered a non-patentable subject matter.
The process of patenting inventions is a legally complex path, requiring strict adherence to a multitude of rules. Let us consider the most typical deficiencies and errors that may lead to delays, requests for examination, or even the refusal to grant a patent.
Many inventors perceive a utility model as a simplified version of an invention patent. While there are some overlaps, preparing a utility model application can be surprisingly complex and distinct from an invention application. Understanding these crucial differences can save you time, effort, and prevent a "useless" patent.
Let's explore some key distinctions:
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has released new guidance that could reshape how AI and software patents are evaluated. The August 2025 memo clarifies Section 101 eligibility, addressing long-standing challenges around what counts as a patentable AI invention.
The world of intellectual property is no longer just about protecting an idea; it's becoming a central arena for geopolitical and technological competition. For businesses and innovators, understanding the shifting global patent landscape is critical. Here are the key forces reshaping patent strategy in 2025.